All the blather going on reminds me of
an encounter I had with a prominent NCD ex-politician and a retinue
of canvassers during the second EU referendum on the treaty. Was that
as far back as 2009?
I read all the information on the first
attempt, including the thousands of words of drivel, it was proposed
we would insert into our constitution. I considered it a bridge too
far and voted NO.
Next time around the insertion was
smaller more concise and one that if given a little relish I could
just about swallow.
Anyway back to the canvassers. I asked
one person what the question on the ballot paper would be. They
replied that I would be asked to vote Yes or NO. I asked on what.
They said THE TREATY.
I then asked the politician what the
question would be and he racked his brain (singular) for a while and
remembered what they had been told to say by their political masters,
who were sh-one-ting themselves that we might vote No again.
He said that we were going to be asked
to vote on replacing an article in our constitution with a new
article relating to the treaty. It was the correct answer.
OH NO says his canvasser helper WE
CAN'T DO THAT. IF WE WANT TO DO THAT WE HAVE TO HAVE A CONSTITUTIONAL
REFERENDUM.
I smiled and continued on my way.
No comments:
Post a Comment